Choosing between a manual or automated ankle-brachial index (ABI) test

Gain insight on the indications for a manual or automated ankle-brachial index test. Click here for more!
Last update26th Feb 2021

Historically, ankle-brachial index (ABI) testing was always done manually, and still is at some sites. Now, automated ABI machines are available in many locations, and they have their benefits. Let’s cover a few differences between manual and automated ABIs so you can pick between the two and appreciate their advantages.

Advantages of manual ABIs

Manual ABIs have three main advantages:

  • They are not hard to learn.
  • They are reliable.
  • They only need a blood pressure cuff with a pump and a Doppler pen.

Manual ABI tests are a great option when a machine isn’t available. But, a downside to a manual ABI is that you cannot print out a report to share.

Figure 1. Advantages of a manual ankle-brachial index (ABI) include that they are easy to learn, are reliable, and only require a blood pressure cuff with a pump and a Doppler pen.

In fact, ABI ratios can be even be calculated without the use of a Doppler pen. In an emergency situation when an ABI machine or a Doppler pen is not available, you can simply grab a portable blood pressure (BP) machine. Put the cuff on each limb and take the patient’s systolic pressures to manually calculate the ABI ratios.

This is less accurate because without the Doppler you will not hear the waveforms. Doppler waveforms are more sensitive and are typically faster at detecting the earliest pulse. However, blood pressure cuffs can give you a general idea if a disease is present—especially if you see a big drop between the arm and ankle, which is helpful in an emergency.

If a manual ABI is performed, there is still the option of using an older photoplethysmography (PPG) portable recorder to perform digit PPG and toe-brachial index (TBI) testing. The results can be printed and scanned into the patient’s chart.

Figure 2. An older photoplethysmography (PPG) portable recorder can be used to perform digit PPGs and toe-brachial index (TBI) testing in conjunction with a manual ankle-brachial index (ABI).

Advantages of using an automated ABI machine

Of course, when one is available, an automated ABI machine has several advantages:

  • Automated protocols
  • Automated calculations
  • Ease of TBI testing
  • Ability to print / transfer a report with analog waveforms
Figure 3. Advantages of using an automated ankle-brachial index (ABI) machine include automated protocols, automated calculations, ease of toe-brachial index (TBI) testing, and the ability to print or transfer a report with analog waveforms.

As you can see, an automated ABI machine may be preferable, but a manual ABI still provides information that is reliable and useful for diagnostic purposes.

Become a great clinician with our video courses and workshops

Recommended reading

  • Aboyans, V, Criqui, MH, Abraham, P, et al. 2012. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation126: 2890–2909. PMID: 23159553
  • Cervin, A, Wanhainen, A, and Björck, M. 2020. Popliteal aneurysms are common among men with screening detected abdominal aortic aneurysms, and prevalence correlates with the diameters of the common iliac arteries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg59: 67–72. PMID: 31757587
  • Cleveland Clinic. 2021. Leg and foot ulcers. Cleveland Clinichttps://my.clevelandclinic.org
  • Cleveland Clinic. 2021. Marfan syndrome. Cleveland Clinichttps://my.clevelandclinic.org
  • Cleveland Clinic. 2021. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES). Cleveland Clinichttps://my.clevelandclinic.org
  • Cleveland Clinic. 2021. Statin medications & heart disease. Cleveland Clinichttps://my.clevelandclinic.org
  • Collins, L and Seraj, S. 2010. Diagnosis and treatment of venous ulcers. Am Fam Physician81: 989–996. PMID: 20387775
  • Høyer, C, Sandermann, J, and Peterson, LJ. 2013. The toe-brachial index in the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg58: 231–238. PMID: 23688630
  • Jaoude, WA. 2010. Management of popliteal artery aneurysms. SUNY Downstate Department of Surgeryhttp://www.downstatesurgery.org
  • Johns Hopkins Medicine. 2021. Aneurysm. Johns Hopkins Medicinehttps://www.hopkinsmedicine.org
  • Kassem, MM and Gonzalez, L. 2020. “Popliteal artery aneurysm”. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • Moxon, JV, Parr, A, Emeto, TI, et al. 2010. Diagnosis and monitoring of abdominal aortic aneurysm: current status and future prospects. Curr Probl Cardiol35: 512–548. PMID: 20932435
  • Richert, DL. 2016. Gundersen/Lutheran Ultrasound Department Policy and Procedure Manual. Gundersen Health Systemhttps://www.gundersenhealth.org
  • Rivera, PA and Dattilo, JB. 2020. “Pseudoaneurysm”. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • Stanford Medicine 25. 2021. Measuring and understanding the ankle brachial index (ABI). Stanford Medicine 25https://stanfordmedicine25.stanford.edu/
  • Teo, KK. 2019. Acute peripheral arterial occlusion. Merck Manuals Professional Editionhttps://www.merckmanuals.com
  • The Regents of the University of California. 2020. Diabetic foot ulcers. UCSF Department of Surgeryhttps://surgery.ucsf.edu
  • Zwiebel, WJ and Pellerito, JS. 2005. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. 5th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders. (Zwiebel and Pellerito 2005, 254–259)

About the author

Elizabeth Tenny, BS RVT RDCS
Elizabeth is a Registered Vascular Technologist in the Department of Vascular Surgery, Stanford Health Care, USA.
Author Profile